Matthew Rooney: Why North America still matters
Mr. Rooney will be a Keynote Speaker at the 19th Annual Ports-to-Plains Alliance Annual Conference in San Angelo, TX on September 13-15, 2016
Americans can agree that the United States is geographically located on the continent of North America, and that Canada is to our north and Mexico to our south. Beyond that, agreement seems to be breaking down among many about the value of North America.
Some even seem to think it would be a good idea to wall ourselves off from our North American neighbors, and that doing so would make us more prosperous and secure. But this kind of thinking ignores the numerous benefits to the United States of our geographical location. In fact, most of what we think we know about Canada and Mexico and our relationships with them is wrong. Even further, any move to build higher barriers to the movement of trade, investment, ideas and — yes — people in North America would make Americans less prosperous and less secure.
The key to the prosperity and security of the American people lies in a closer North American economic relationship — in embracing the de facto North American community that has long existed and shaping it to ensure that it continues to enhance our security and prosperity.
Former President George W. Bush’s commitment to raising awareness of North America’s importance to the United States begins with the conviction that this is not a theoretical proposition. As the United States prepares to implement the Trans-Pacific Partnership, recommitting to a strong North America will be crucial to our ability to compete and thrive in this emerging global context. Read on about 5 North American Myths…
Matthew Rooney, a former senior official of the U.S. Department of State under presidents of both parties, is director of the George W. Bush Institute’s economic growth initiative.
The Truth about Mexicans and Americans
Mexico is the most important country in the world for Americans. No other people have as much positive impact on the daily lives of Americans across the board, from demography and society, to trade and national security.
Unfortunately, there are those who would use Mexico and Mexicans as a political piñata. They are trying to drive a wedge between us no matter what the cost to North American prosperity and security.
The world is full of people who would do us harm. Attacking Mexicans is like picking a fight with your best friend in a schoolyard full of bullies.
Mexico and the United States are deeply integrated, for the benefit of both countries.
Approximately 35 million Mexicans and Mexican Americans live in the US (equivalent to the population of Canada) and between 1-3 million Americans are in Mexico at any given time. We have the most legally crossed border in the world along 2,000 miles and 50 ports of entry, where we do over $500 billion dollars worth of trade each year. These numbers in order of magnitude are higher than those of other important international relationships, like that of France and Germany.
Mexicans in the US are not “illegal immigrants”.
Nearly 80% of people of Mexican descent in the US are either American citizens (by far the majority), or legal residents. This means that 10% of America’s citizen population is of Mexican origin. Undocumented immigration from Mexico is falling. Pew Research numbers show that there are now fewer Mexican immigrants, overall, and that even more are returning to Mexico than are coming to the US. The “problem” of immigration from Mexico is more a politically expedient straw man than an actual problem and the phenomenon is shrinking, not growing. Read on…
Border Governments to Be Included in State Transportation Talks
Congressman Henry Cuellar announced a change in the 2017 U.S. House Transportation Appropriations Bill.
It would encourage local city and county representatives to be included in talks, when deciding how to use federal funds toward road projects.
"If you notice behind me there when you come in the driveway there's a big hole there in the road then. That sort of shakes stuff up in the truck when you're running across them", said Thomas Grimes.
That's Thomas Grimes.
A truck driver from Tennessee, who like millions of other drivers, wants safe, driveable roads.
Grimes says that despite the abundance of trucks in the area - it's not always easy finding a place to park during the evening.
"When I can't find nowhere to park I just have to go to a place that I can park and put on there and just get to a safe haven. Sometimes I have to park on the side of the road by the shipper in the road close to it", said Grimes.
That could change if the house transportation appropriations bill goes through.
Congressman Cuellar says the changes would make sure local leaders have a say when it comes to projects in their city.
He explains why this was important for Laredo.
District like Laredo were recently left out of discussions on project selection, I knew something had to be done." Read on…
Important upgrades in the works for Amarillo roads
As construction continues on Loop 335 south of Amarillo, there are some updates and safety reminders TxDOT wants area drivers to know.
Just like any major construction project, the Loop could take many years to completely update to accommodate heavy traffic.
But two projects currently under construction do have tentative completion dates.
The bridge being rebuilt over BNSF railways between Georgia and Washington streets is expected to be complete next spring.
And construction on the overpass between I-27 and Georgia Street is planned to finish by spring of 2018.
Traffic patterns will continue to change for both these locations as they are upgraded.
But the entire loop has a long way to go before all upgrades are complete.
"It's gonna take a while," said Gus Khankarli, Director of Transportation, Planning and Development for the Amarillo branch of TxDOT. "Even in the metropolitan areas and other places of the state, I mean there are projects that they have been working on for many many years, so this is no different. So you upgrade based on funding availability and needs."
There are several "needs" Khankarli has identified for Amarillo roads, including upgrading the I-40 and Loop 335 interchange at Lakeside Drive, and updating the Bell Street crossing over I-40.
Plus, the I-40 bridges that go over Ross and Arthur streets are listed as some of the top most traveled structurally deficient bridges in the state.
"Peak days of 66,000 semis travel through our city on a daily basis," said Mayor Paul Harpole. "Over 50,000 every day. That represents 48% of the traffic on I-40. That mean's there's another 60,000 cars and trucks going through our city every day." Read on…
This Bakken stat speaks directly to the long-term nature of the play
At $50/b oil … At $60/b oil… At $70/b oil…
Lynn Helms never disappoints in his ability to connect the current state of the Bakken to an easy-to-understand analogy. At his always-highly-attended speech at the Williston Basin Petroleum Conference, he likened the current Bakken to that of a race. We are in lap 100 of a 500 mile race, he said, (if the race doesn’t add new technology, which would change everything). While the analogy seemed to resonate with attendees and make perfect sense—he compared a five speed shifter to oil prices noting that different oil prices push the Bakken’s activity levels to different speeds—it wasn’t the analogy that should have Bakken onlookers intrigued. It was the raw numbers he shared on future well count and planned activity.
With 11,000 Bakken wells producing today there will have to be decades of drilling to properly produce the Bakken. The number to do so is roughly 65,000 wells, a number we have heard before and one that the industry has shared a consensus on. The important number and stat of the day is this: according to Helms, more than 31,000 Bakken wells have already received a permit or are in the planning stages by operators. The number is a very clear reminder to us all that the Bakken really is a long-term play. Coupled with the fact that Helms said operators are no longer chasing oil prices to be economic after their work to drive down operations costs have been successful, and the WBPC 2016 edition couldn’t have chosen a more accurate theme that the Bakken is moving forward. Read on...
Could Midland have 3 interstates in the future?
While the city of Midland and Permian Basin Metropolitan Organization get ready to meet today to see what’s possible for expansion in northeast Midland near State Highway 349, a reader recently inquired on Facebook about whether Interstate 27, which starts north of Amarillo and ends south of Lubbock, would ever extend southward to Midland.
The Reporter-Telegram reached out to all-things-interstate-planning guru James Beauchamp, president of the Midland-Odessa Transportation Alliance last week for his thoughts.
Beauchamp, speaking by phone, said that a little bit of history is important when considering such an interstate extension. He said that from 1993 to 1997, a study was conducted that included three southern I-27 extensions: “For the southern routes, one went from Lubbock to Post to Snyder, down to Roscoe on I-20; one came down U.S. Highway 87 to SH 349 to Midland; and then the other one was US 87 on down to Big Spring.”
A lot has changed since that study, however.
“If you look at those three routes since 1997, all of them except the route coming to the Midland-Odessa area have lost a significant amount of traffic,” Beauchamp said.
Even though traffic on the Midland route has increased, Beauchamp said turning it into an interstate-grade highway might not be justifiable because traffic counts between Midland and Lubbock don’t support the need to upgrade, especially considering that each mile of interstate costs $10.5 million to construct.
I-27 is rare among interstate highways because only its northern terminus connects to an interstate, so any future southern expansion would most likely connect to I-20. Read on…
Opinion: Why can't Congress stop the EPA's assault on private property rights?
Former House Agriculture Committee Chairman Larry Combest (R-TX) explains why Congress has not been able to stop the WOTUS rule in his latest Op-Ed
Karl Marx wrote that, "The theory of the communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.
The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) "Waters of the United States" regulation may not be the abolishment of private property rights that Marx had in mind, but it's one heck of a start.
Before chalking this off as an exaggeration, let's rehash the breadth of EPA's rule.
First, all tributaries, loosely defined as anything with a "bed and banks and ordinary high water mark" (OHWM), are categorically included under the definition of "Waters of the United States" and, thus, subject to regulation. This definition not only ignores the historic understanding of Waters of the United States as generally confined to navigable and interstate waters — although somewhat broadened by the U.S. Supreme Court to also encompass certain adjacent waters — but it is nearly all-encompassing, if this definition is to be interpreted literally. Common ditches and less can easily meet this definition. Moreover, even if the EPA were to depart from habit and restrain its regulatory ambitions, there is nothing to prevent third-party lawsuits from forcing the implementation of the rule to its maximum application. Therefore, any land except that which is perfectly flat can easily fall under the EPA's rule and therefore the civil and criminal penalties sanctioned under that statute. Read on…